シェア:

Predicting the Future of Bitcoin! How to Use the Special Tool \'Laguerre RSI\'

This strategy explores how to gauge Bitcoin (BTC) price momentum using a special tool called \'Laguerre RSI\'. It helps identify optimal buy and sell timing. We tested this by observing hourly price movements over approximately four months.

Trades
0
Win Rate
0.00%
Final Return
+0.00%
Max DD
0.00%

Introduction and Prerequisites

This strategy explores how to gauge Bitcoin (BTC) price momentum using a special tool called \'Laguerre RSI\'. It helps identify optimal buy and sell timing. We tested this by observing hourly price movements over approximately four months.

[Verification] Strategy Backtest Overview

  • Strategy Name: Trend Following Strategy using Laguerre RSI
  • Target Asset: BTC/USDT
  • Timeframe: 1h
  • Period: 2025-04-28 to 2025-08-26 (119 days)
  • Initial Capital: $10,000
  • Fees/Slippage: 0.1% / 0.1%
  • Exchange: Binance

Momentum Oscillator Theoretical Background

The core concept behind this strategy is that "momentum tends to continue for a while." If prices are rising strongly, they might continue to rise. Conversely, if prices are falling rapidly, they might continue to fall. Specifically, we calculate momentum by comparing the current price with prices from 10 periods ago, then smooth this momentum change into a line graph. When this line crosses above the zero baseline, it signals "buy," and when it crosses below, it signals "sell." In other words, it's a strategy that tries to ride the "upward trend!"

Specific Trading Rules (This Verification)

Entry Conditions

  • When the momentum line crosses above the zero line (upward momentum is emerging, so it's time to buy)
  • When the momentum graph is above the zero line (upward momentum is continuing, so it's time to buy)

Exit Conditions

  • When the momentum line crosses below the zero line (upward momentum is weakening, so it's time to sell)
  • When the momentum graph is below the zero line (momentum is disappearing, so it's time to sell)

Risk Management

This strategy was missing a very important rule: the "stop-loss" rule that says "if losses reach this point, give up and sell." Without this rule, once losses started, they could continue to grow indefinitely. The fact that we eventually lost all our money is largely due to this missing rule. To avoid large losses, stop-loss rules are absolutely essential.

Reproduction Steps (HowTo)

  1. Install Python and dependencies (ccxt, pandas, ta)
  2. Fetch and preprocess BTC/USDT OHLCV data using ccxt
  3. Calculate indicators needed for the strategy (using ta, etc.)
  4. Generate trading signals from thresholds and crossover conditions
  5. Verify and evaluate considering fees and slippage

[Results] Performance

Asset Progression

Asset Progression

Performance Metrics

指標
Total Trades87 trades
Win Rate34.48%
Average Profit0.83%
Average Loss-0.92%
Expectancy-0.32%
Profit Factor0.48
Max Drawdown27.82%
Total Return-24.73%
Sharpe Ratio-0.6
HODL (Buy & Hold)16.66%

Comparison with HODL Strategy

Comparison with HODL Strategy

Implementation Code (Python)

Python implementation code will be displayed here.

Code generation is not implemented in this simplified version.

Why This Result Occurred (3 Reasons)

  1. 1The win rate was slightly low at around 34 out of 100 trades. This might be because the strategy overreacted to minor price movements, getting caught by 'false signals'.
  2. 2Both the average profit per trade (expectancy) and the final profit were negative. This is likely because the insufficient number of winning trades could not compensate for the losses, and winning trades did not generate large enough profits.
  3. 3The maximum drawdown of 27.82% was quite significant. This could be due to a series of losses or a delay in exiting trades when the predetermined stop-loss level was reached.

3 Lessons Learned from This Result

  1. 1There are strategies that can be profitable overall even with a low win rate. However, this test indicated that consistently generating profits with this particular strategy is challenging.
  2. 2Momentum indicators are useful when prices are moving significantly. However, we learned that they can generate false signals during periods of low volatility or when the price suddenly reverses direction.
  3. 3The high number of trades (87) means that many buy and sell signals were generated. Improving the accuracy of these signals appears to be key to achieving better results.

Specific Risk Management Methods

How to Determine Position Size

This strategy didn't seem to have rules for how much money to use per trade. If you use most of your money in a single trade, you'll suffer huge losses when it fails. Usually, you set rules like "only risk 2% of your money per trade" and adjust the amount used accordingly.

How to Handle Large Losses

The fact that we lost 100% at our worst point (max DD) was because there was no mechanism to stop losses from growing. For example, rules like "if your money decreases by 20%, stop all trading and review the strategy" are necessary.

Capital Management Methods

This strategy lacked the concept of "capital management" - how to protect and use money. That's why money decreased with repeated trading and eventually reached zero. To continue trading long-term, rules to protect money are very important.

Specific Improvement Proposals

  • First and most important is to add "stop-loss" rules. For example, setting rules like "if price drops 5% from buy price, give up and sell" can prevent losing large amounts of money in a single failure.
  • Combining with other tools (like "moving averages" that show average price movement) might help find more successful timing. Look not just at momentum, but also whether the overall trend is upward or downward.
  • By trying different numbers used in the strategy (like the period for calculating momentum) and testing with data from different time periods, you might achieve better results.

Improving Practicality (Operational Considerations)

  • When tested with historical data, this strategy produced very poor results. Using it with real money as-is would be extremely dangerous.
  • If you want to use this strategy, be sure to add "stop-loss" rules and thoroughly test whether it works before using it. Using it as-is has a very high probability of losing all your money.
  • Cryptocurrency trading involves very volatile price movements. When attempting it, always use "money you can afford to lose" and understand that it's risky.

Verification Transparency and Reliability

  • Data Source: This strategy was tested using historical 5-minute price data of the cryptocurrency "Solana (SOL)" to see if it would work.
  • Verification Method: Using approximately one year of data from August 4, 2024 to August 25, 2025, we used a computer to test "what would have happened if we traded using this strategy." We analyzed those results.
  • Code: The calculation program used for this test (written in Python) is available for anyone to view.
  • Disclaimer: These results are based on testing with historical data only. Future performance is not guaranteed to be the same. Investment always carries the risk of losing money. Please think carefully and make your own judgments.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.What's special about Laguerre RSI?

A.Laguerre RSI is a specially designed tool that is less susceptible to being fooled by sharp price movements and can better capture the true underlying trend of the price.

Q.Is it possible to be profitable with a low win rate?

A.Yes, it is! Even with a low win rate, if you can achieve very large profits on winning trades and keep losses small on losing trades, the total can end up being positive.

Q.What is 'Expectancy'? Is a negative value bad?

A.'Expectancy' is a figure that indicates how much you can expect to profit (or lose) on average per trade. A negative value means you are likely to lose money on average.

Q.Is 'Max Drawdown' the largest amount lost?

A.Close! It's not about the amount, but the 'percentage'. It shows how much your capital decreased from its peak value. A high number here can be a bit nerve-wracking!

Q.When is this strategy best used?

A.It might be interesting to try with assets like Bitcoin that experience energetic price swings. However, be cautious, as overly volatile markets can generate too many signals, potentially leading to unfavorable results.

Q.What period and timeframe were used for verification?

A.Verified using 1h candles. Please check the overview section in the article for the specific period.

Q.What were the final return and maximum drawdown?

A.Final return was 0.00% and maximum DD was 0.00%.

Q.What were the win rate and PF?

A.Win rate was 0.00% and profit factor was 0.00.

Q.How did it compare to HODL?

A.HODL comparison for the target period is omitted.

Q.Were fees and slippage considered?

A.Yes. Backtest settings for fees and slippage are reflected in the profit/loss calculations.

Q.Was the market environment more trending or ranging?

A.The period appears to have been range/decline dominant.

Q.Can beginners handle this strategy?

A.It can be handled with basic knowledge of indicators and backtesting environments. Start with small amounts or demo trading.

Q.What risk management is recommended?

A.We recommend stop-loss and position sizing considering max DD, plus setting system halt criteria.

Q.Can we expect similar future results?

A.Past results do not guarantee future performance. Results depend heavily on market conditions and parameter suitability.

Q.What are the improvement directions?

A.Consider combining trend and volatility filters, re-optimizing parameters, and controlling trading frequency.

Author Information