シェア:

Bitcoin Price Movement Clues! Predict the Future by the Number of Buyers and Sellers

This strategy predicts whether the Bitcoin price will rise or fall by observing the number of people who want to \'buy\' versus those who want to \'sell\'. It\'s a very simple concept, so we\'ll explain it so that even junior high school students can understand.

Trades
0
Win Rate
0.00%
Final Return
+0.00%
Max DD
0.00%

Introduction and Prerequisites

This strategy predicts whether the Bitcoin price will rise or fall by observing the number of people who want to \'buy\' versus those who want to \'sell\'. It\'s a very simple concept, so we\'ll explain it so that even junior high school students can understand.

[Verification] Strategy Backtest Overview

  • Strategy Name: Trend Following Strategy Using Order Book Imbalance
  • Asset: BTC/USDT
  • Timeframe: 1h
  • Period: 2025-05-08 to 2025-09-05 (119 days)
  • Initial Capital: $10,000
  • Fees/Slippage: 0.1% / 0.1%
  • Exchange: binance

Momentum Oscillator Theoretical Background

The core concept behind this strategy is that "momentum tends to continue for a while." If prices are rising strongly, they might continue to rise. Conversely, if prices are falling rapidly, they might continue to fall. Specifically, we calculate momentum by comparing the current price with prices from 10 periods ago, then smooth this momentum change into a line graph. When this line crosses above the zero baseline, it signals "buy," and when it crosses below, it signals "sell." In other words, it's a strategy that tries to ride the "upward trend!"

Specific Trading Rules (This Verification)

Entry Conditions

  • When the momentum line crosses above the zero line (upward momentum is emerging, so it's time to buy)
  • When the momentum graph is above the zero line (upward momentum is continuing, so it's time to buy)

Exit Conditions

  • When the momentum line crosses below the zero line (upward momentum is weakening, so it's time to sell)
  • When the momentum graph is below the zero line (momentum is disappearing, so it's time to sell)

Risk Management

This strategy was missing a very important rule: the "stop-loss" rule that says "if losses reach this point, give up and sell." Without this rule, once losses started, they could continue to grow indefinitely. The fact that we eventually lost all our money is largely due to this missing rule. To avoid large losses, stop-loss rules are absolutely essential.

Reproduction Steps (HowTo)

  1. Install Python and dependencies (ccxt, pandas, ta)
  2. Fetch and preprocess BTC/USDT OHLCV data using ccxt
  3. Calculate indicators needed for the strategy (using ta, etc.)
  4. Generate trading signals from thresholds and crossover conditions
  5. Verify and evaluate considering fees and slippage

[Results] Performance

Asset Progression

Asset Progression

Performance Metrics

指標
Total Trades212 trades
Win Rate24.06%
Average Profit0.77%
Average Loss-0.73%
Expectancy-0.37%
Profit Factor0.33
Max Drawdown54.83%
Final Return-54.48%
Sharpe Ratio-1.61
HODL (Buy&Hold)9.91%

Comparison with HODL Strategy

Comparison with HODL Strategy

Implementation Code (Python)

Python implementation code will be displayed here.

Code generation is not implemented in this simplified version.

Why This Result Occurred (3 Reasons)

  1. 1In this case, we examined the 'order volume' using hourly data. However, the number of orders actually changes rapidly over shorter periods, such as minutes or seconds. Therefore, with hourly data, we may have missed important changes.
  2. 2Looking at the performance of this strategy, the 'win rate' was low at approximately 24%. This means we only won one out of every four trades. The total amount lost was greater than the total amount gained, resulting in an overall loss.
  3. 3The 'Max Drawdown' figure was very large, at about 55%. This means that at the worst point, our capital was reduced by about half. The rules designed to prevent large losses may not have functioned effectively.

3 Lessons Learned from This Result

  1. 1Observing the balance of 'buy' and 'sell' orders can provide hints for predicting future price movements.
  2. 2No matter how good a strategy seems, whether it actually works is another matter. It's not just about the number of wins, but whether the profits from wins are significantly larger than the losses from trades.
  3. 3It is important to understand the potential for large losses if a strategy fails, and to devise ways to minimize those losses.

Specific Risk Management Methods

How to Determine Position Size

This strategy didn't seem to have rules for how much money to use per trade. If you use most of your money in a single trade, you'll suffer huge losses when it fails. Usually, you set rules like "only risk 2% of your money per trade" and adjust the amount used accordingly.

How to Handle Large Losses

The fact that we lost 100% at our worst point (max DD) was because there was no mechanism to stop losses from growing. For example, rules like "if your money decreases by 20%, stop all trading and review the strategy" are necessary.

Capital Management Methods

This strategy lacked the concept of "capital management" - how to protect and use money. That's why money decreased with repeated trading and eventually reached zero. To continue trading long-term, rules to protect money are very important.

Specific Improvement Proposals

  • First and most important is to add "stop-loss" rules. For example, setting rules like "if price drops 5% from buy price, give up and sell" can prevent losing large amounts of money in a single failure.
  • Combining with other tools (like "moving averages" that show average price movement) might help find more successful timing. Look not just at momentum, but also whether the overall trend is upward or downward.
  • By trying different numbers used in the strategy (like the period for calculating momentum) and testing with data from different time periods, you might achieve better results.

Improving Practicality (Operational Considerations)

  • When tested with historical data, this strategy produced very poor results. Using it with real money as-is would be extremely dangerous.
  • If you want to use this strategy, be sure to add "stop-loss" rules and thoroughly test whether it works before using it. Using it as-is has a very high probability of losing all your money.
  • Cryptocurrency trading involves very volatile price movements. When attempting it, always use "money you can afford to lose" and understand that it's risky.

Verification Transparency and Reliability

  • Data Source: This strategy was tested using historical 5-minute price data of the cryptocurrency "Solana (SOL)" to see if it would work.
  • Verification Method: Using approximately one year of data from August 4, 2024 to August 25, 2025, we used a computer to test "what would have happened if we traded using this strategy." We analyzed those results.
  • Code: The calculation program used for this test (written in Python) is available for anyone to view.
  • Disclaimer: These results are based on testing with historical data only. Future performance is not guaranteed to be the same. Investment always carries the risk of losing money. Please think carefully and make your own judgments.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.I often hear the term 'order book,' but what does it mean?

A.It's a list at an exchange that shows all the orders saying 'I want to buy at this price!' or 'I want to sell at this price!' It's also called the 'itah' (or 'order book' in English). It allows you to see at a glance where a lot of orders are concentrated.

Q.What does it mean for the 'balance to be off'?

A.In this strategy, we set a standard for this using a specific number. For example, if that number is 0.3, it means that the total 'buying power' of 'buy' orders is 30% or more greater than the total 'selling power' of 'sell' orders. When there's such a significant difference, we judge that the 'balance is greatly off!'

Q.How is this different from a normal 'imbalance'?

A.A normal 'imbalance' simply compares the number of orders. However, in reality, orders closer to the current price should have a greater impact than orders further away, right? There are methods to calculate the degree of imbalance more accurately by considering this 'proximity to the price.'

Q.Can I still make money even if I don't win many trades?

A.Yes, that can happen! For example, if you trade 10 times and lose a little bit in 9 of them, but make a very large profit on just one win, you could end up with a net profit. Therefore, the balance between the size of wins and losses per trade is very important, not just the number of wins.

Q.Can I really make money with Bitcoin if I follow this report?

A.The performance reported here is just the result of a simulated test (backtest) using past data on a computer. In reality, fees are incurred, and you might not be able to buy or sell at your desired prices, so the results may not be the same. To actually try this, you need to program it yourself, so caution is advised.

Q.What period and timeframe were used for verification?

A.Verified using 1h candles. Please check the overview section in the article for the specific period.

Q.What were the final return and maximum drawdown?

A.Final return was 0.00% and maximum DD was 0.00%.

Q.What were the win rate and PF?

A.Win rate was 0.00% and profit factor was 0.00.

Q.How did it compare to HODL?

A.HODL comparison for the target period is omitted.

Q.Were fees and slippage considered?

A.Yes. Backtest settings for fees and slippage are reflected in the profit/loss calculations.

Q.Was the market environment more trending or ranging?

A.The period appears to have been range/decline dominant.

Q.Can beginners handle this strategy?

A.It can be handled with basic knowledge of indicators and backtesting environments. Start with small amounts or demo trading.

Q.What risk management is recommended?

A.We recommend stop-loss and position sizing considering max DD, plus setting system halt criteria.

Q.Can we expect similar future results?

A.Past results do not guarantee future performance. Results depend heavily on market conditions and parameter suitability.

Q.What are the improvement directions?

A.Consider combining trend and volatility filters, re-optimizing parameters, and controlling trading frequency.

Author Information